6533b851fe1ef96bd12a8fc4
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The Role of General and Selective Task Instructions on Students’ Processing of Multiple Conflicting Documents
Maria Del Carmen MarínRaquel Cerdánsubject
media_common.quotation_subjectlcsh:BF1-990computer.software_genre050105 experimental psychologyTask (project management)03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinetask-oriented readingReading (process)Psychology0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesQuality (business)General PsychologyOriginal Researchmedia_commonmultiple documentsbusiness.industryon-line reading05 social sciencesContrast (statistics)Focus (linguistics)Test (assessment)Comprehensionlcsh:PsychologyTrustworthinessfunctional readingArtificial intelligencecomprehensionbusinessPsychologycomputer030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNatural language processingdescription
This study was designed to test the role of general and selective task instructions when processing documents, which vary as regards trustworthiness and position toward a conflicting topic. With selective task instructions, we refer to concrete guidelines as how to read the texts and how to select appropriate documents and contents, in contrast to general task instructions. Sixty-one secondary school students were presented with four different conflicting documents in an electronic learning environment and were told to write an essay based on the information from the texts. Only half of the students were told to only use information from two out of the four texts to write their essay (i.e., selective condition). As predicted, students told to focus on specific documents and not use all of them for the assigned task (i.e., selective condition) better discriminated the quality of documents and type of information for the task.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-09-03 | Frontiers in Psychology |