6533b851fe1ef96bd12a9036

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Subtle Increases in Interletter Spacing Facilitate the Encoding of Words during Normal Reading

Pablo GomezManuel Perea

subject

Time FactorsDigital eramedia_common.quotation_subjectSpeech recognitionScienceFixation OcularSocial and Behavioral SciencesYoung AdultNeuropsychologyEncoding (memory)Reading (process)Computer softwaremedicinePsychophysicsSaccadesPsychologyHumansApplied Psychologymedia_commonLanguagePhysicsMultidisciplinaryPsycholinguisticsQDyslexiaRCognitive PsychologyLinguisticsExperimental Psychologymedicine.diseaseCommunicationsMental HealthScience EducationPattern Recognition VisualReadingWord recognitionFixation (visual)MedicineNormal readingResearch Article

description

BackgroundSeveral recent studies have revealed that words presented with a small increase in interletter spacing are identified faster than words presented with the default interletter spacing (i.e., w a t e r faster than water). Modeling work has shown that this advantage occurs at an early encoding level. Given the implications of this finding for the ease of reading in the new digital era, here we examined whether the beneficial effect of small increases in interletter spacing can be generalized to a normal reading situation.MethodologyWe conducted an experiment in which the participant's eyes were monitored when reading sentences varying in interletter spacing: i) sentences were presented with the default (0.0) interletter spacing; ii) sentences presented with a +1.0 interletter spacing; and iii) sentences presented with a +1.5 interletter spacing.Principal findingsResults showed shorter fixation duration times as an inverse function of interletter spacing (i.e., fixation durations were briefest with +1.5 spacing and slowest with the default spacing).ConclusionsSubtle increases in interletter spacing facilitate the encoding of the fixated word during normal reading. Thus, interletter spacing is a parameter that may affect the ease of reading, and it could be adjustable in future implementations of e-book readers.

10.1371/journal.pone.0047568http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3474730