6533b851fe1ef96bd12a9623
RESEARCH PRODUCT
233 Diabetic care in a network of health professionals in the beaune area
Mercier PatriciaNoubel JulienDumont Françoissubject
Gynecologymedicine.medical_specialtyPediatricseducation.field_of_studyHealth professionalsbusiness.industryHealth PolicyPopulationPrimary careDiabetic careNational health insuranceBiomedical dataHealth careMedicineDiabetic patientbusinesseducationdescription
Objectives The GPSPB a Network of Health Professionals in the Beaune Area is a primary care network created February 2002. It covers a population of over 77,000 people and gathers together 123 health professionals. One of the health priorities of the network concerns diabetes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the overall satisfaction of patients with the diabetes care they receive and to measure the medico-economic impact of coordinated care (GPs, dieticians and podiatrists). Program To follow-up satisfaction questionnaires sent to patients with diabetes who applied to the GPSPB from April 2006 to the end of December 2007 (48 people). To study the evolution of relevant biomedical data (HbA1c, LDL, BMI) to assess the efficacy of care in 52 patients with type 2 diabetes from April 2006 to May 2008. To compare diabetic patients managed by the GPSPB with other diabetic patients in Cote d9Or in terms of quantitative data supplied by the national health insurance system for services provided between June 2008 to May 2009. This comparison includes all costs incurred by these patients. Results Sixty-two percent of patients responded to the questionnaire, and overall the level of satisfaction was high, particularly regarding the combined dietetics and podiatry consultation. Most diabetic patients were stabilised or had seen improvements in their results over this period of time. There was a significant decrease in LDL (−0.16 g/l), p 2 ) and HbA1c (−0.43%), however, were not significant. In the study period, the average cost for a GPSPB diabetic patient was 9,812 Euros while the average cost for a Cote-d9Or diabetic patient was 13,592. The savings of 3780 Euros per patient was mainly due to reduced costs for hospitalisation, transport and income replacement. GPSPB diabetics, however, incur higher costs for paramedical services. Conclusion This study shows that in chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, it is possible to improve management of patients thanks to the creation of more efficient patient-centered care networks, with the coordinated intervention of different health professionals; the GPSPB is such a network. Patients seem satisfied with the additional support offered by the network. Even though there were few patients in the study, we observed an improvement in their biomedical data over two years with non-significant decreases in HbA1c and BMI, and a significant decrease in LDL. It has also shown the impact of the network in the reduction of health care costs. More research is necessary to determine whether this type of care organisation modifies the incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population, and whether these results persist in the long term. Prise en charge des patients diabetiques dans un groupement interprofessionnel de sante territorial. Evaluation de 52 patients du Groupement des Professionnels de Sante du Pays Beaunois. Objectif(s), Contexte Le Groupement des Professionnels de Sante du Pays Beaunois (GPSPB) est un reseau de soins de sante primaire initie en fevrier 2002. Il couvre une population de plus de 77000 habitants et regroupe 123 professionnels de sante. Une des priorites de sante du groupement concerne le diabete. Il s9agit d9evaluer chez les patients diabetiques leur satisfaction globale et de mesurer l9impact medico-economique d9une prise en charge coordonnee (generalistes, dieteticiens et podologues). Programme Exploitation de questionnaires de satisfaction adresses aux patients diabetiques ayant sollicite le GPSPB d9avril 2006 a fin decembre 2007 (48 personnes). Etude de l9evolution de donnees biomedicales pertinentes (HbA1c, LDLc, IMC) pour juger de l9efficacite de la prise en charge concernant les 52 patients diabetiques de type 2 d9avril 2006 a mai 2008. Comparaison de juin 2008 a mai 2009 des donnees chiffrees de l9assurance maladie entre les patients diabetiques du GPSPB et les autres patients diabetiques de Cote-d9Or. Cette comparaison porte sur tous les postes de depenses. Resultats Sur un taux de reponse au questionnaire de 62%, il faut retenir essentiellement la satisfaction globale des personnes prises en charge, concernant en particulier la consultation couplee de dietetique et de podologie. La plupart des patients diabetiques sont stabilises ou ameliores concernant leur prise en charge sur cette periode. Ainsi, il existe une diminution non significative de l9IMC (−3,73 Kg/m 2 ) et de l9HbA1C (−0,43%). Par contre, avec un p Sur la periode d9etude, le cout moyen d9un patient diabetique du GPSPB etait de 9 812 euros alors que le cout moyen d9un patient diabetique de Cote-d9Or etait de 13 592 euros. L9economie realisee de 3780 euros par patient se retrouve surtout sur les postes de frais d9hospitalisations, de transports et de revenus de remplacements. Les diabetiques du GPSPB consomment plus de frais d9auxiliaires medicaux. Conclusion Cette etude permet de montrer que sur une maladie chronique telle que le diabete de type 2, on peut avoir une amelioration de la prise en charge des patients grâce a une organisation de soins plus performante centree sur le patient et coordonnee avec les differents professionnels de sante: c9est ce que propose le GPSPB. Les patients semblent satisfaits de la prise en charge complementaire offerte par le groupement. Meme avec peu de patients dans l9etude, on observe une amelioration de leurs donnees biomedicales avec sur deux ans une baisse de l9HbA1c, de l9IMC et de facon significative du LDLc. On a de plus montre l9efficience du dispositif mis en œuvre. Reste a savoir si cette prise en charge modifie l9incidence de la morbi-mortalite dans cette population et si ces resultats sur une plus longue periode sont retrouves.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-01 | BMJ Quality & Safety |