6533b851fe1ef96bd12aa0ec
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Pitfalls in the powder diffraction analysis of zeolites ZSM-5 and ZSM-8
R.x. FischerRobert D. ShannonClaudia WeidenthalerClaudia Weidenthalersubject
CrystallographyRadiationMaterials scienceGeneral Materials ScienceZSM-5Condensed Matter PhysicsInstrumentationPowder diffractiondescription
Crystal structure analyses by the Rietveld method have shown that the framework structures of zeolites ZSM-5 and ZSM-8 are essentially identical. Therefore, it is difficult to distinguish the two phases especially when the template-free H forms are studied. In addition, some inconsistencies in publications on the two zeolites aggravate the correct interpretation of the powder diagrams. A powder pattern published for ZSM-8 which indicates significant differences between the lattice constants of ZSM-8 and ZSM-5 is shown to be incorrectly indexed. Correct reindexing gives lattice constants for ZSM-8 matching average ZSM-5 values. Peak splitting of a ZSM-8 reflection at 2θ≈23° (CuKα) has been used frequently to distinguish ZSM-8 from ZSM-5. However, it is also a common feature of ZSM-5 diagrams when the difference between a and b lattice constants is big enough to separate hkl and khl reflections within the instrumental resolution. Our data on two ZSM-8 samples indicate that cell dimensions of ZSM-8 do not deviate from average ZSM-5 values. It is suspected that effects in the decomposition of crystals upon calcination, and/or morphology and shape of twin individuals, and/or stacking faults account for different sorption properties of the two zeolites rather than differences in their average crystal structures.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
1994-09-01 | Powder Diffraction |