6533b852fe1ef96bd12aaebb

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quality of Life in Women After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancies: A Multicentric Study

Marco PetrilloGiovanni ScambiaSimone MarnitzPierandrea De IacoAlessandro LucidiJalid SehouliVito ChianteraVito ChianteraM DessoleAngelica NaldiniMartina Rossi

subject

Adultmedicine.medical_specialtyConstipationGenital Neoplasms Femalemedicine.medical_treatmentHealth StatusUrinary Diversion03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineQuality of lifeSurveys and QuestionnairesmedicineBody ImageHumansAgedRetrospective StudiesGynecology030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicinePelvic exenterationbusiness.industryHazard ratioColostomyRepeated measures designObstetrics and GynecologyRetrospective cohort studyQuality of life Pelvic exenteration Gynecological cancerVulvar cancerMiddle Agedmedicine.diseasePelvic ExenterationOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisGynecological cancerQuality of LifeFemalemedicine.symptombusiness

description

Objectives This retrospective, multicentric study investigates quality-of-life issues and emotional distress in gynecological cancer survivors submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods The Global Health Status scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30; the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (CX24), and EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires were administered at least 12 months from surgery only in women with no evidence of further recurrence after PE. Statistical analysis was performed by the analysis of variance (for repeated measures. Results Ninety-six subjects affected by gynecological malignancies receiving PE were enrolled in the study. Anterior PE was performed in 47 patients (49%), posterior PE was performed in 29 cases (30.2%), and total PE performed in 20 women (20.8%). In 38 cases (39.6%), a definitive colostomy was performed. Urinary diversion with continent pouch was created in 11 patients. (11.5%), whereas in the remaining cases, a noncontinent pouch was reconstructed. Patients showed a significant discomfort in attitude to disease (71.5 ± 4.7), body image (48.9 ± 6.4), financial difficulties (56.2 ± 5.8), gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation, 47.8 ± 5.1; diarrhea, 62.4 ± 6.6; appetite loss, 43.6 ± 6.7), insomnia (64.5 ± 6.6), Global Health Status (64.6 ± 3.8), physical functioning (65.8 ± 4.6), role functioning (58.8 ± 5.8), and emotional functioning (67.4 ± 4.2). A higher number of ostomies (hazard rate [HR], 7.613; P = 0.012), the creation of a noncontinent bladder (HR, 8.230; P = 0.009), and of definitive colostomy (HR, 8.516; P = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of poorer Global Health Status scores. Older age (HR, 11.235; P = 0.003), vaginal/vulvar cancer (HR, 7.369; P = 0.013), total/posterior PE (HR, 7.393; P = 0.013), higher number of ostomies (HR, 7.613; P = 0.012), the creation of a noncontinent bladder (HR, 8.230; P = 0.009), and of definitive colostomy (HR, 8.516; P = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of lower body image levels. Conclusions Long-term psycho-oncological support is strongly recommended. The reduction of ostomies seems the most effective way to improve patients' quality of life.

10.1097/igc.0000000000000612http://hdl.handle.net/10447/239434