6533b852fe1ef96bd12ab793
RESEARCH PRODUCT
“Thanks for Watching.” The Effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements
Hanna ReinikainenJuha MunnukkaDevdeep MaityVilma Luoma-ahosubject
media_common.quotation_subject050801 communication & media studiesendorser credibilityendorsement effectivenessyleisö0508 media and communicationsArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)PerceptionaudienceCredibilityparticipationValence (psychology)ta518vlogitvalenceAudience participationta512General Psychologyvlogmedia_commonosallistuminen05 social sciences050301 educationPerceived credibilityOnline communityaudience participationvloggausHuman-Computer Interactionvalenssi (psykologia)Psychology0503 educationSocial psychologyparasocial relationshipdescription
This study examines the effectiveness of brand endorsements in vlogs (video blogs) by assessing the role of audience participation, parasocial relationship, and valence toward vlog endorsements on the perceived credibility of the vlogger and brand attitudes. Four experimental conditions were created on Qualtrics based on a YouTube vlog where the endorser reviewed a few products. The data were collected using Mturk and analyzed with 203 usable responses. The findings indicate that audience participation in the vlog enhances para-social relationship with the vlogger, thus further fostering the vlogger's perceived credibility as an endorser. Additionally, the valence of the audience's attitudes toward vlog endorsements moderates the audience participation–parasocial relationship. The results show that vlogs with high levels of audience participation are more likely to increase the acceptance of the brand's endorsement via enhanced credibility perceptions among viewers. Hence, time should be spent choosing vloggers who are active in the online community. This study contributes to the understanding of the distinct characteristics of vlogs that specifically affect endorsement effectiveness. The focal role of parasocial relationship for message acceptance in the context of vlogs is also highlighted. peerReviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-04-01 |