6533b853fe1ef96bd12ac104

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Negative associations between parasite avoidance, resistance and tolerance predict host health in salmonid fish populations

Anssi KarvonenPekka HyvärinenInes Klemme

subject

0106 biological sciencesavoidancehost defenceEvolutionTroutSalmo salarPopulationZoologyparasitismiSalmonid fishBiologyTrade-off010603 evolutionary biology01 natural scienceseläinten käyttäytyminenGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologyHost-Parasite InteractionsresistanceFish Diseases03 medical and health sciencespopulaatiotloisetGenetic variationisäntäeläimetAnimalsParasite hostingParasitesParasite Infections14. Life underwatereducation030304 developmental biologyGeneral Environmental Sciencetrade-offsietokyky0303 health scienceseducation.field_of_studytoleranceGeneral Immunology and MicrobiologyResistance (ecology)Host (biology)imumadotlohikalatGeneral Medicinetrematode parasitegeneettinen muunteluresistenssiTrematodaGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences

description

Genetic variation in defence against parasite infections is fundamental for host–parasite evolution. The overall level of defence of a host individual or population includes mechanisms that reduce parasite exposure (avoidance), establishment (resistance) or pathogenicity (tolerance). However, how these traits operate and evolve in concert is not well understood. Here, we investigated genetic variation in and associations between avoidance, resistance and tolerance in a natural host–parasite system. Replicated populations of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) and sea trout (an anadromous form of brown trout, Salmo trutta ) were raised under common garden conditions and infected with the eye fluke Diplostomum pseudospathaceum . We demonstrate significant genetic variation in the defence traits across host populations and negative associations between the traits, with the most resistant populations showing the weakest avoidance and the lowest infection tolerance. These results are suggestive of trade-offs between different components of defence and possibly underlie the genetic variation in defence traits observed in the wild. Because the three defence mechanisms affect host–parasite evolution in profoundly different ways, we emphasize the importance of studying these traits in concert.

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202005043027