6533b853fe1ef96bd12ac13f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cardiovascular Mortality in Chest Pain Patients: Comparison of Natriuretic Peptides With Novel Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Stress.

Francisco OjedaStefan BlankenbergElvin ZenginHans-j. RupprechtRenate B. SchnabelChristoph SinningChristoph BickelDirk WestermannTanja ZellerK.j. Lackner

subject

MaleAcute coronary syndromemedicine.medical_specialtyChest Painmedicine.drug_class030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyChest painCardiovascular SystemRisk Assessment03 medical and health sciencesAdrenomedullin0302 clinical medicineCopeptinStress PhysiologicalInternal medicineGermanyTroponin INatriuretic Peptide BrainmedicineNatriuretic peptideHumansAcute Coronary SyndromeProtein PrecursorsAgedProportional Hazards Modelsbiologybusiness.industryHazard ratioTroponin IGlycopeptidesReproducibility of Results030208 emergency & critical care medicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseTroponinPeptide FragmentsCardiologybiology.proteinBiomarker (medicine)Femalemedicine.symptomCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessBiomarkers

description

Natriuretic peptides are the standard biomarker for risk stratification in cardiovascular disease. Novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress might allow refinement in risk stratification for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We tested the performance of these novel biomarkers for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients who presented with ACS.In the AtheroGene study, 873 patients presented with ACS in the emergency department. Biomarkers measured were: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro BNP (NT-proBNP), midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide, midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), copeptin, and troponin I. The median follow-up time was 4 years and during this time 50 patients died from cardiac causes.Cox regression analysis for the continuous variables NT-proBNP and BNP showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.9 and 1.8, respectively, for 1 SD increase (P0.001 and P = 0.003) in the fully adjusted model. Novel biomarkers with MR-proADM had an HR of 3.2, followed by midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide with an HR of 1.9 (both P0.001), and copeptin with an HR of 1.6 (P0.001). C-index revealed MR-proADM as the best discriminator for identifying patients with the outcome with a C-index = 0.8, and C-index was 0.72 for NT-proBNP (P for comparison = 0.017). Integrated discrimination improvement for MR-proADM was 0.059 compared with NT-proBNP (P = 0.016), thus providing background that MR-proADM was better to identify persons with the outcome. Troponin I levels at the time of admission were not significant for risk stratification.In patients who present with ACS the novel biomarker, MR-proADM was the best predictor for outcome. MR-proADM adds modest information and is useful for risk prediction in ACS patients.

10.1016/j.cjca.2016.05.010https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27568502