6533b853fe1ef96bd12ac272

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section

Jari YlinenKirsi PiitulainenHannu KautiainenHannu KautiainenArja HäkkinenJuha Paloneva

subject

MalePsychometricsSports medicinemedicine.medical_treatmentShoulder painSeverity of Illness IndexRESPONSIVENESSDisability EvaluationRisk FactorsOrthopedics and Sports MedicineFinlandPain MeasurementAged 80 and overRehabilitationmittausMiddle AgedReliabilitymedicine.anatomical_structureConvergent validityFemaleARTHRITISResearch ArticleAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyShoulderanimal structuresThe American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Assessment Form (ASES)AdolescentPsychometricsDISORDERSshoulder paineducationValidityYoung AdultPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRheumatologyPredictive Value of TestsmedicineCriterion validityHumansRotator cuffASESAgedCultural Characteristicsreliabilitybusiness.industryConstruct validityReproducibility of ResultsTranslating3126 Surgery anesthesiology intensive care radiologyThe American Shoulde and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Assessment Form (ASES)3121 General medicine internal medicine and other clinical medicinevaliditeettiOrthopedic surgeryCROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATIONPhysical therapySelf ReportTRANSLATIONbusiness

description

Background The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) is one of the most widely used shoulder outcome tools in clinical work and in scientific studies. However, it has not been validated in the Finnish language. The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ASES to the Finnish language and to study the psychometric properties of the self-report section of the ASES. Methods A total of 105 patients with shoulder symptoms answered the questionnaires of the ASES, a single disability question, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The reliability of the ASES questionnaire was studied using a test-retest procedure at 2-week intervals. Psychometric assessment was performed by testing the construct validity, internal consistency, the criterion validity, and the convergent validity of the ASES. Results The reproducibility and internal consistency of the ASES were 0.83 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.90) and 0.88 (95% Cl 0.84 to 0.91). There were no significant differences between the diagnostic groups in the pain scores from the ASES, and the function score was significantly higher in the instability group compared to the other groups. The convergent validity of the ASES correlated with the SST, r = 0.73 (p < 0.001); the single disability question, r = -0.74 (p < 0.001); and the Physical Component Score of the SF-36, r = 0.57 (p < 0.001). Conclusions The Finnish version of the ASES proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing shoulder disabilities in patients with different shoulder diagnoses, including rotator cuff disease, instability, and osteoarthritis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-272) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201408232620