6533b853fe1ef96bd12acafd
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Olfactory categorization: a developmental study.
Dominique ValentinLucile Chanquoysubject
AdultMaleOlfactory perceptionOlfactory categorizationEstheticsLavenderConcept FormationHuman Development[ SDV.AEN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and NutritionExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyFlowers050105 experimental psychologyDevelopmental psychologyToxicologyDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesChildAgedAge differences05 social sciencesfood and beveragesRecognition PsychologyMiddle AgedClassificationOlfactory PerceptionCategorizationOdorChild PreschoolFruitLinear ModelsFemaleFrancePlants EdiblePsychology[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition050104 developmental & child psychologydescription
International audience; This study examined the ability of children to classify fruit and flower odors. We asked four groups of children (4-11 years of age) and a group of adults to identify, categorize, and evaluate the edibility, liking, and typicality of 12 fruit and flower odors. Results showed an increase in interindividual agreement with age for the taxonomic (fruit/flower) and function-based (edible/nonedible) categories but not for the hedonic component. So, it seems that this hedonic component is not the explicit basis for this increase in interindividual agreement when categorizing an odor as a fruit/flower odor or as being edible or nonedible. An age-related trend was also observed on the typicality scores: The youngest group of children did not show a typicality gradient, but all of the other groups did. Blackcurrant and lemon were rated as the most typical fruit odors, whereas raspberry and peach were rated as the least typical. For flower odorants, results were not as clear, yet it seems that for all groups lavender was considered as quite typical.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-11-01 |