6533b853fe1ef96bd12acb5a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Expression and compartmentalisation of the glycolytic enzymes GAPDH and pyruvate kinase in boar spermatogenesis

Gerhard WegenerUwe WolfrumSandra FeidenGünter Kamp

subject

MaleGene isoformendocrine systemSwineSomatic cellPyruvate KinaseReproductive technologyFlagellumBiologyEndocrinologystomatognathic systemGeneticsAnimalsTissue DistributionSpermatogenesisAcrosomeMolecular BiologyFertilisationGlyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenaseGeneticsurogenital systemSpermatozoaCell CompartmentationCell biologyIsoenzymesReproductive MedicineOrgan Specificitybiology.proteinAnimal Science and ZoologyGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)GlycolysisPyruvate kinaseDevelopmental BiologyBiotechnology

description

Boar spermatozoa contain isoforms of both glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, EC 1.2.1.12) and pyruvate kinase (PK, EC 2.7.1.40). The sperm-specific forms, GAPDH-S and PK-S, are tightly bound to cell structures. By immunofluorescence microscopy GAPDH-S and PK-S were localised in the principal piece of the boar sperm flagellum as well as in the acrosomal region of the sperm head and at the head–midpiece junction. The midpiece of the flagellum, however, contains isoforms of GAPDH and PK that were only recognised by antibodies against somatic GAPDH and PK, respectively, but not by the antibodies against GAPDH-S and PK-S. In sections of boar testis, GAPDH-S and PK-S were first detected in elongating spermatids when both the developing flagellum and the head were labelled with antibodies against GAPDH-S and PK-S. In contrast, antibodies against rabbit muscle GAPDH and PK labelled all developmental stages of germ cells and also neighbouring contractile cells. Thus, the structure-bound sperm-specific enzymes, GAPDH-S and PK-S, appeared only late in spermatogenesis simultaneously with the development of the structures to which they are bound. Anchoring glycolytic enzymes to structures in these mitochondria-free regions may secure ATP-production for both motility and acrosome function.

https://doi.org/10.1071/rd08004