6533b853fe1ef96bd12acd2f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses.

Sonja EtzlerPriscilla Gregório HertzMartin RettenbergerReinhard Eher

subject

AdultMaleRecidivismPsychometricsSex offenderSex OffensesReproducibility of ResultsSample (statistics)Middle AgedViolenceRisk AssessmentCross-validationPsychiatry and Mental healthRecidivismRisk appraisalGermanyHumansFemaleViolence riskRisk assessmentPsychologySexual contactGeneral PsychologyClinical psychologyRetrospective Studies

description

The aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the German version of the revised Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG), the VRAG-R. Therefore, VRAG-R ratings were made retrospectively in an Austrian sample of 534 individuals convicted of a sexual offense who were followed up with an average of 7.62 years. The VRAG-R showed large effect sizes for the predictive accuracy of violent (AUC = .75) and general recidivism (AUC = .78) and significant but rather small effect sizes (AUC = .63 and .61, respectively) in predicting any sexual and sexual contact recidivism. Furthermore, for the prediction of violent recidivism but not for sexual recidivism the VRAG-R was incrementally predictive beyond the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) and the Static-99. Finally, the VRAG-R absolute recidivism rates for the risk bins showed satisfactory calibration properties. Taken together, the results of the present study support the cross-national utility of the VRAG-R and its use in applied risk assessment settings also in German-speaking countries.

10.1177/1079063219841901https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31010400