6533b853fe1ef96bd12ad5d1

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Could Alcohol Abuse Drive Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators’ Psychophysiological Response to Acute Stress?

Sara Vitoria-estruchÁNgel Romero-martínezLuis Moya-albiolMarisol Lila

subject

AdultMaleacute stressAlcohol DrinkingHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesisintimate partner violencelcsh:MedicineAlcohol abuseimpulsivity050109 social psychologyImpulsivityArticle03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineskin conductancemedicineHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesReactivity (psychology)cardiorespiratory variablesRecidivismbusiness.industrylcsh:R05 social sciencesStressorautonomic nervous systemPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseAutonomic nervous systemAlcoholismLocus of controlImpulsive BehaviorDomestic violencemedicine.symptombusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryStress PsychologicalClinical psychology

description

Proactively aggressive individuals have been shown to present a different pattern of autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation from that of individuals characterized by reactive violence. Although attempts have been made to classify intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators based on ANS reactivity to acute stress, subsequent studies have failed to replicate this classification. Notably, the proposed classification neglected the role of chronic alcohol abuse in ANS dysregulation and the fact that this dysregulation entails an abnormal stress response. The aim of the present study was to analyze the response profile (psychological state and ANS response) of groups of IPV perpetrators with high (n = 27) and low (n = 33)-risk alcohol use to an acute stressor, compared to controls (n = 35). All IPV perpetrators scored higher on executive dysfunctions and impulsivity and showed larger decreases in positive affect, less satisfaction, and a higher external locus of control after the stressor than controls. IPV perpetrators with low-risk alcohol use had higher skin conductance levels and breathing reactivity than controls, especially during preparatory, task, and recovery periods. This information could help to develop methods for increasing batterers&rsquo

10.3390/ijerph15122729http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122729