6533b854fe1ef96bd12adfcc

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Osseous reaction to implantation of two endodontic cements : mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium enriched mixture (CEM)

Saeed AsgaryAli KazemiShahriar ShahiMohammad Jafar EghbalHadi MokhtariSaeed RahimiMehran Mesgari-abbasiDaryoush Mohajeri

subject

Mineral trioxide aggregateBiocompatibilityDental CementsDentistrychemistry.chemical_elementCalciumBone tissueBone and BonesEndodonticsRoot Canal Filling MaterialsDental cementIn vivomedicineAnimalsFemurRats WistarAluminum CompoundsGeneral DentistryChemistrybusiness.industrySilicatesBiomaterialOxidesCalcium Compounds:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]RatsDrug Combinationsmedicine.anatomical_structureOtorhinolaryngologyUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASResearch-ArticleCalciumSurgerybusiness

description

Aim: The aim of the present in vivo study was to determine bone tissue reaction to calcium enriched mixture (CEM) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) using a rat femur model. Study Design: Sixty-three rats were selected and randomly divided into three groups of 21 each [experimental groups (n=15), control (n=6)]. Implantation cavities were prepared in each femoral bone and randomly filled with the biomaterials only in the experimental groups. The animals in three groups were sacrificed 1, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Histologic evaluations comprising inflammation severity and new bone formation were blindly made on H&E-stained decalcified 6-µm sections. Results: At 1, 4, and 8 weeks after implantation number of inflammatory cells had decreased in the CEM, MTA and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. Conversely, new bone formation had increased in all the experimental and control groups, without statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The results suggest that biocompatibility of MTA, as gold standard, and CEM cement as a new endodontic biomaterial are comparable Key words:Endodontics, MTA,CEM, osseous reaction.

10.4317/medoral.18136http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59876