6533b854fe1ef96bd12ae207
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Ornamentation of dermal bones of Metoposaurus krasiejowensis and its ecological implications
Mateusz AntczakAdam Bodziochsubject
0106 biological sciencesAmphibianBiotope010506 paleontologyPopulationlcsh:MedicineSculptureMetoposaurus010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologyTemnospondylibiology.animaleducationNeoteny0105 earth and related environmental sciencesTrophic leveleducation.field_of_studybiologyEcologyGeneral Neurosciencelcsh:RSkullTemnospondyliPalaeoecologyFossilGeneral MedicineAmphibianbiology.organism_classificationClavicleSexual dimorphismGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciencesdescription
Background Amphibians are animals strongly dependent on environmental conditions, like temperature, water accessibility, and the trophic state of the reservoirs. Thus, they can be used in modern palaeoenvironmental analysis, reflecting ecological condition of the biotope. Methods To analyse the observed diversity in the temnospondyl Metoposaurus krasiejowensis from Late Triassic deposits in Krasiejów (Opole Voivodeship, Poland), the characteristics of the ornamentation (such as grooves, ridges, tubercules) of 25 clavicles and 13 skulls were observed on macro- and microscales, including the use of a scanning electron microscope for high magnification. The different ornamentation patterns found in these bones have been used for taxonomical and ecological studies of inter- vs. intraspecific variation. Results Two distinct types of ornamentation (fine, regular and sparse, or coarse, irregular and dense) were found, indicating either taxonomical, ecological, individual, or ontogenetic variation, or sexual dimorphism in M. krasiejowensis. Discussion Analogies with modern Anura and Urodela, along to previous studies on temnospondyls amphibians and the geology of the Krasiejów site suggest that the differences found are rather intraspecific and may suggest ecological adaptations. Sexual dimorphism and ontogeny cannot be undoubtedly excluded, but ecological variation between populations of different environments or facultative neoteny (paedomorphism) in part of the population (with types of ornamentations being adaptations to a more aquatic or a more terrestrial lifestyle) are the most plausible explanations.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-07-01 | PeerJ |