6533b855fe1ef96bd12aff26

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Short-term responses of soil decomposer and vegetation communities to stump harvesting in boreal forests

Hannu FritzeJari HaimiSaana Kataja-aho

subject

Forest floorEcologySoil biodiversitySoil biologySoil organic matterta1183ForestrySoil classificationManagement Monitoring Policy and Lawta4112DecomposerStump harvestingEnvironmental scienceta1181Soil mesofaunaNature and Landscape Conservation

description

Recently, in addition to logging residues, stumps have become an important component in energy production since there is growing global interest in the use of renewable energy sources in order to decrease anthropogenic carbon emissions. Harvesting of stumps influences the forest floor by changing vegetation and soil organic layers and exposing mineral soil across large areas. We studied whether stump harvesting after clear felling poses further short-term changes in boreal forest soil decomposer community (microbes and mesofauna) and vegetation when compared to the traditional site preparation practice (mounding). In general, stump harvesting caused decline in enchytraeid abundance but did not induce further major changes in decomposer community otherwise nor in vegetation of each soil micro-habitat (intact soil and exposed mineral soil). However, the abundances of almost all decomposer animals were lower in the exposed mineral soil than in the intact soil. Stump removal increased the area of exposed mineral soil in the clear felled areas, leading to lower amount of high quality habitat for most decomposer organisms. Hence, it is obvious that there are (or will be) differences in the decomposer community dynamics between the treatments at the forest stand level. Both species richness and coverage of plants benefitted from large-scale exposure of mineral soil. Because the stump removal procedure disturbs soil organic layers and negatively affects the decomposer community, it has the potential to alter nutrient dynamics in forests.

10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.002https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.002