6533b856fe1ef96bd12b1cb4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia inoccupationalhealth services: Analyses of outcomes upto24monthspost-treatment

Christer HublinAslak SavolainenRitva LuukkonenHeli JärnefeltMikael SallinenMikael SallinenSoili Kajaste

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtymedicine.medical_treatmentOccupational Health ServicesExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDysfunctional familyCognitive behavioral therapy for insomniaAffect (psychology)Severity of Illness IndexOccupational safety and healthMedical RecordsShift workSleep Disorders Circadian RhythmSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSurveys and Questionnairesmental disordersmedicineInsomniaHumansCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitionta3141Middle Aged3. Good healthCognitive behavioral therapyPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyPhysical therapyFemalemedicine.symptomPsychologyClinical psychologyFollow-Up Studies

description

Abstract Objective Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective treatment for persistent insomnia. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of and response patterns to CBT-I among daytime and shift workers with insomnia over a 24-month follow-up in occupational health services (OHS). Methods The participants were 59 media workers with chronic insomnia, of whom 69% were reached at 24-month follow-up. Sleep diaries and questionnaires over seven measurement points were used as outcomes. Trained OHS nurses led the CBT-I groups. The study design was a non-randomized group intervention. Results Self-perceived severity of insomnia, sleep-related dysfunctional cognitions, and psychiatric symptoms in particular showed improvements over a 24-month follow-up. Working hour arrangements did not affect the results. Based on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), 62% of the participants showed a moderate improvement after CBT-I, whereas the remaining participants showed only a minor improvement. Conclusions Our results indicate that CBT-I delivered by OHS leads to long-term improvements among both daytime and shift workers. Two groups were identified according to the degree of improvement of insomnia; one comprising two thirds of the participants with a moderate response and the other comprising one thirds of the participants with a modest response. The results need to be interpreted cautiously as insomnia was mild (ISI was on average under 15 points at all measurement points) and improvements were relatively small in the sample, and the study design was non-randomized.

10.1016/j.brat.2014.02.007http://juuli.fi/Record/0028753814