6533b856fe1ef96bd12b2793

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A novel multidimensional questionnaire for the assessment of emotional dysregulation in adolescents: Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity and Stability questionnaire–youth version (RIPoSt–Y)

Elena ValenteFlavia DragoStefano BerloffaFrancesca PlaciniAnna Rita MontesantoGianluca SessoNina LoriauxAgnese MolestiGabriele MasiSimone PisanoAnnarita MiloneValentina ViglioneSilvia Boldrini

subject

PsychometricsAdolescentBipolar disorderEmotionsConcurrent validityReproducibility of ResultEmotional dysregulationCBCL03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSurveys and QuestionnairesmedicineHumansADHDSurveys and QuestionnaireBipolar disorderReactivity (psychology)EmotionSchoolsQuestionnaireReproducibility of ResultsConstruct validityEmotional dysregulationmedicine.disease030227 psychiatryPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyConvergent validitySelf ReportPsychologyConstruct (philosophy)Psychometric030217 neurology & neurosurgeryHumanClinical psychology

description

Abstract Background The failure to regulate emotions, namely emotional dysregulation (ED), is a relevant construct in adolescent psychiatry, in terms of prognostic and developmental implications. We developed and validated a novel self-report questionnaire for the assessment of ED, the RIPoSt-Y, both in clinical and non-clinical samples. Methods Items selection and subscales construction were conducted on healthy controls (n=374), while test-retest reliability was evaluated in a subsample (n=72); internal consistency was examined both in the control group and in two clinical samples, respectively including patients with Bipolar Spectrum Disorders (BSD; n=44) and ADHD (n=34). Construct, concurrent and convergent validity were also assessed. Results Thirty-one items were finally retained, and three subscales were identified (Affective Instability, Emotional Reactivity, Interpersonal Sensitivity). Test-retest was significant for each subscale with moderate-to-good correlations, and internal consistency showed good-to-excellent coefficients. Construct validity was supported by significant differences between patients and controls and gender-related differences. Concurrent validity was confirmed through significant associations with two subscales of the CHT-Q, while convergent validity proved to be significant with the CBCL/YSR dysregulation-profile. Cut-offs were also computed to discriminate clinically significant scores of ED. Limitations The use of a school-based survey to recruit controls could have biased our results; gender distributions between clinical and non-clinical samples were significantly different. Conclusions Our novel questionnaire proved to be a valid and reliable tool able to assess the presence of ED in youths and to characterize this fundamental construct in its multidimensional facets.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.037