6533b856fe1ef96bd12b2ccc
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Meat substitutes: formulations and comparative analysis: micronutrient intakes
Philippe Cayotsubject
anémiebiodisponibilitévitaminessuccédané de viandeviande végétale[SDV.IDA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food engineeringminérauxdescription
The nutritional quality of a food is not only assessed by its protein intake and the quality of proteinintake, but also by its intake of trace elements. Animal products are the only sources of vitamin B12, apartfrom pharmaceutical food supplements. The amounts of other B vitamins are much greater in meatproducts: 4 to 6 times higher for vitamin B1, 2 to 20 times for vitamin B2, 5 to 30 times for vitamin B3, 2 to 12 times for vitamin B5, 2 to 100 times for vitamin B5, as much as 30 times for vitamin B6. Less markedly,the mineral content is also higher for cooked meat or cooked meat products compared to a ready-to-eatvegetable analogue: from 2 to 9 times more zinc in meat products than in analogues and vegetarian dishsources of protein, and up to 3 times more for iron. The quantity is not the only criterion to consider. Thebioavailability of Iron and magnesium is lower in plant products. These minerals, however, are wellassimilated during the consumption of meat products. The efficiency of iron absorption during theconsumption of meat products is partly linked to the form of the ion (ferric or ferrous iron, or heme iron, i.e.associated with hemoglobin or myoglobin) and the absence of complexes such as phenols and phytatepresent in plants.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-01-01 |