6533b856fe1ef96bd12b3028

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Nectar sugar production across floral phases in the Gynodioecious Protandrous Plant Geranium sylvaticum [corrected].

Carolin NuortilaMinna-maarit KytöviitaSandra Varga

subject

PollinationPlant NectarGeraniumCarbohydrateslcsh:MedicineFlowersPlant ScienceBiologymedicine.disease_causeHermaphroditeRewardPollinatorPollenPlant-Environment InteractionsBotanymedicineNectarAnimalsHermaphroditic OrganismsPollinationlcsh:ScienceC200 BotanyBiologyFlowering PlantsEvolutionary BiologyMultidisciplinaryEcologyPopulation BiologyPlant Ecologylcsh:RPlant NectarPlantsbiology.organism_classificationEvolutionary EcologyGeranium sylvaticumSeedsNectar guideta1181Pollenlcsh:QPopulation EcologyC180 EcologyResearch Article

description

Many zoophilous plants attract their pollinators by offering nectar as a reward. In gynodioecious plants (i.e. populations are composed of female and hermaphrodite individuals) nectar production has been repeatedly reported to be larger in hermaphrodite compared to female flowers even though nectar production across the different floral phases in dichogamous plants (i.e. plants with time separation of pollen dispersal and stigma receptivity) has rarely been examined. In this study, sugar production in nectar standing crop and secretion rate were investigated in Geranium sylvaticum, a gynodioecious plant species with protandry (i.e. with hermaphrodite flowers releasing their pollen before the stigma is receptive). We found that flowers from hermaphrodites produced more nectar than female flowers in terms of total nectar sugar content. In addition, differences in nectar production among floral phases were found in hermaphrodite flowers but not in female flowers. In hermaphrodite flowers, maximum sugar content coincided with pollen presentation and declined slightly towards the female phase, indicating nectar reabsorption, whereas in female flowers sugar content did not differ between the floral phases. These differences in floral reward are discussed in relation to visitation patterns by pollinators and seed production in this species. peerReviewed

10.1371/journal.pone.0062575http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3632553?pdf=render