6533b857fe1ef96bd12b3c45

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Submitting “Alternative Facts” to Debate: A Weberian Perspective on Post-truth Politics

Kari Palonen

subject

Nihilismjulkinen keskustelunihilismiGeneral Chemical Engineeringmedia_common.quotation_subjectMax Weberpost-truth politicsnihilismGermanPoliticspolitiikkata517parliamentary debatePolitical philosophySociologyalternative factsRelation (history of concept)RelativismWebermedia_commonLeo StraussStraussscholarly debateWeber MaxLeolcsh:JC11-607lcsh:Women. Feminismlcsh:Political theorylanguage.human_languagerelativismEpistemologyChoseAlternative Facts; Leo Strauss; Max Weber; nihilism; parliamentary debate; post-truth politics; relativism; scholarly debateRhetoriclanguageStrauss Leolcsh:HQ1101-2030.7relativismitotuusMax

description

'Oxford Dictionaries' chose “post-truth” as the “Word of the Year 2016”, while the association of German linguists (Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache) did the same for '“postfaktische Politik'”. “Alternative facts”, launched by Kellyanne Conway concerning the attendance at Donald Trump’s inaugural, was a third variant in this cluster. In this article, I shall discuss Max Weber’s parliamentary perspective on the critique of given facts and of the powers of science in relation to the debates around post-truth politics. A critical assessment of Leo Strauss’s critique of Weber as a nihilist and relativist introduces the problematic. One aim of the article is to illustrate how even trivial slogans can be situated in the history of political concepts, political theory and rhetoric.

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2018-09-01Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory
https://doi.org/10.7227/r.21.2.2