6533b857fe1ef96bd12b50fe
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Resource Partitioning in Food, Space and Time between Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) and European Whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) at the Southern Edge of Their Continuous Coexistence
Rune KnudsenPer-arne AmundsenHallvard JensenMikko Kiljunensubject
0106 biological sciencesComposite ParticlesTroutlcsh:MedicineMarine and Aquatic Sciences01 natural sciencesBrown troutIsotopesVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480::Marine biology: 497Salmolcsh:ScienceMultidisciplinarybiologyfood.dishEcologyEcologyNorwayPhysicsStable IsotopescoexistenceFishesPlanktonGastrointestinal ContentsTrophic InteractionsrinnakkaiseloFreshwater FishArctic charrTroutCommunity EcologyOsteichthyesVertebratesPhysical SciencesFreshwater fishEcological NichesSalmonidaeResearch ArticleFreshwater EnvironmentsAtoms010603 evolutionary biologyZooplanktonfoodCoregonus lavaretusAnimalsProfundal zoneParticle PhysicsSalmonidaeEcosystemSalvelinus010604 marine biology & hydrobiologylcsh:REcology and Environmental SciencesOrganismsBiology and Life SciencesAquatic EnvironmentsFeeding BehaviorVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480::Marinbiologi: 497Bodies of Waterbiology.organism_classificationInvertebratesLakesFoodEuropean whitefishEarth Sciencesta1181lcsh:Qdescription
Arctic charr and European whitefish are considered to be strong competitors in lakes, with the latter usually being the superior species. However, high niche plasticity and lake morphometry may suggestively facilitate resource partitioning and coexistence between charr and whitefish. Here, we explore the trophic niche utilization (diet and habitat use) of charr and whitefish co-occurring with brown trout in the deep and oligotrophic Lake Fyresvatnet, southern Norway (59˚05’N, 8˚10’E). Using CPUE, stomach contents and stable isotope analyses, a distinct resource partitioning was revealed between brown trout and the other two species. Brown trout typically occupied the littoral zone, feeding on benthic invertebrates, surface insects and small-sized whitefish. In contrast, charr and whitefish were predominantly zooplanktivorous, but diverged somewhat in habitat utilization as charr shifted seasonally between the profundal and the littoral zone, whereas whitefish were found in the upper water layers (littoral and pelagic habitats). Accordingly, the stable isotope values of carbon (δ13C) reflected a pelagic orientated prey resource use for both charr and whitefish, whereas brown trout had elevated carbon and nitrogen (δ15N) signatures that reflected their benthivore and piscivore diet, respectively. The findings suggest that charr may not rely upon the profundal zone as a feeding habitat but as a refuge area, and may coexist with whitefish if a third competitive and predatory species like brown trout co-occur in the lake. The study indicates that a general high habitat plasticity of Arctic charr may be essential in the presently observed coexistence with a competitively superior fish species like whitefish, and that a third fish species like brown trout may facilitate this particular fish community structure. peerReviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-01-25 |