6533b858fe1ef96bd12b56d7

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Doing change and continuity: age identity and the micro–macro divide

Pirjo Nikander

subject

Health (social science)Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Social PsychologyArgumentDiscursive psychologyPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthIdentity (social science)SociologyGeriatrics and GerontologyMacroSocial psychologyEpistemologyTest (assessment)

description

ABSTRACTThis paper is a study of the discursive management of notions of change andcontinuity in interview talk. It presents selected short empirical examples frominterviews with 22 Finnish baby-boomers, and discusses the methodological andtheoretical issues that arise. Following a review of the major approaches to thestudy of age identity, the analytic intersection between qualitative gerontologyand discursive psychology is explored. The analysis identifies how the frequentuse of a ‘provisional continuity device’ enables speakers simultaneously both toacknowledge and to distance themselves from factual notions of physical orpsychological lifespan change. The key methodological argument is that the dis-cursive analysis of age-in-interaction cannot necessarily be achieved through themyopic micro-study of discursive strategies, but rather two suggestions are made.First, it is argued that analytically-anchored and rigorous discursive gerontologythat both systematically draws on and contributes to the broad field of discursiveresearch provides a means by which to test empirically post-modern concep-tualisations of age identity. Second, it is suggested that analyses of age-talkin everyday and institutional settings provide an analytical and theoreticalmiddle-ground between the macro versus micro or ‘microfication’ debate ingerontology.KEY WORDS – age identity, baby-boom cohort, provisional continuity device,discursive gerontology, micro and macro, microfication.Introduction

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x09008873