6533b858fe1ef96bd12b6405

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cross validation of hard-copy and web-based formats of the Sport Imagery Ability Measure

Anthony P WattTony MorrisNatalia Palacios SamperMontse C. Ruiz

subject

sport imagerySocial Psychologydimensional validityApplied psychologyMeasure (physics)Factor structure050105 experimental psychologyCross-validation03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinereplicabilityWeb application0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesMeasurement invarianceHard copyApplied Psychologybiologytoistettavuusbusiness.industryAthletesmittaus05 social sciences030229 sport sciencesbiology.organism_classificationSport psychologymittausmenetelmätpsykometriikkabusinessPsychologyhuman activitiesurheilijat

description

The purpose of this multi-sample study was to examine the psychometric characteristics, factor structure, and measurement invariance of the hard-copy and web-based versions of a measure of sport imagery ability, termed Sport Imagery Ability Measure (SIAM). In the first sample, Spanish athletes (N = 274, 161 men, 113 women, Mage = 21.91, SD = 6.67) completed a hard-copy version of the SIAM. A newly developed web-based version of the SIAM was cross validated in an independent group (N = 266, 147 men, 119 women, Mage = 25.93, SD = 9.84). A small group of participants (n = 16) completed both versions. Exploratory structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis of the data from the hard-copy version showed that a 3-factor (i.e. generation, feeling, and single senses) solution of the SIAM reached satisfactory fit indices. The 3-factor solution showed good fit to the data obtained through the web-based version of the SIAM. Multi-group comparisons provided support for measurement invariance across gender and competitive level. Evidence of full invariance of factor loadings was obtained for both formats of administration indicating that the factor structure was held across groups, while partial invariance was seen for item intercepts indicating inequality in the intercepts of some indicators. peerReviewed

https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2018.1428209