6533b859fe1ef96bd12b6fdd

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Acquisition of skills in critical emergency medicine: an experimental study on the SIAARTI Academy CREM experience

D. BattagliniA. Ionescu MaddalenaR. R. CaporussoE. GarofaloA. BruniM. G. BocciE. CingolaniA. GiarratanoF. PetriniM. AstutoA. BarelliF. BressanG. CinnellaM. GirardisG. GrasselliP. L. IngrassiaM. MenariniP. PelaiaP. PelosiM. RoccoL. Tritapepe

subject

Professional competencemedicine.medical_specialtyTraditional learningbusiness.industryAnesthesia; Education; Professional competence; Humans; Clinical Competence; Emergency MedicineEducationAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineSIAARTIEmergency medicineEmergency MedicineHumansMedicineAnesthesiaClinical Competencebusiness

description

BACKGROUND In 2019 the SIAARTI developed a seven-days course for residents, focused on critical emergency medicine (CREM) in a hostile environment, that grounds on simulation-based education and training with hands-on simulation, high-fidelity simulators and part-task trainers. This project aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this course in comparison to traditional learning programs in term of technical (TS) and non-technical (NTS) skills. We assessed the improvement in TS and NTS over time, and the ability to involve trainees in corporate activities. METHODS Three-hundred and twenty-seven trainees completed the study. Trainees were allocated into three groups: those who joined the SIAARTI-Academy-CREM course and received a study kit (SA-kit, N.=124), those who received only a study kit (kit, N.=108), and control (N.=95). Eighty-five tests were administered to investigate skills at three timepoints: T0 (baseline), T1 (post-training/kit), and T2 (four months later). RESULTS TS differed among groups (P<0.0001), with the highest points in the SA-kit group at T1 (post-hoc comparison, P<0.0001 vs. kit; P<0.0001 vs. control), and T2 (post-hoc comparison, P<0.0001 vs. kit; P<0.0001 vs. control). NTS differed among groups (P=0.0406), with the highest points in the SA-kit group at T1 (post-hoc comparison, P=0.0337 vs. kit; P=0.0416 vs. control), and T2 (post-hoc comparison, P=0.0073 vs. kit; P=0.3308 vs. control). SA-kit group significantly improved TS (P<0.0001) and NTS (P=0.0006) over time. Involvement in corporate activities of SA-kit was significantly higher than kit and control (P=0.0012). CONCLUSIONS SA-kit improvement in TS and NTS was higher than kit and control and was maintained over time. Participation in this course implemented participation in corporate activities among attendees.

https://doi.org/10.23736/s0375-9393.21.15427-6