6533b859fe1ef96bd12b78c8

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Genomic profile of breast cancer: costeffectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.

Virginia BecerraAlfredo GraciaCarlos CrespoSebastián Matias ChiavennaJavier CortesMax BrosaMiguel ÁNgel SeguíAna Lluch

subject

Oncologymedicine.medical_specialtyCost effectivenessCost effectivenessCàncer de mamaBreast cancerBreast cancerMammaPrintInternal medicinemedicinePharmacology (medical)Online algorithmEspanyaGynecologyPublic healthmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryHealth PolicyEconomic analysisGeneral MedicineCost-effectiveness analysisGenomicsAnàlisi cost-beneficimedicine.diseaseSalut públicaGenòmicaSpainCohortLife expectancyAnàlisi econòmicabusinessOncotype DX

description

Background: Costeffectiveness analysis of MammaPrint® (70-gene signature) in the diagnosis of early breast cancer as a prognosis assay to study the risk of tumor recurrence to administer adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Markov model assuming a cohort of 60-year-old women with breast cancer. Treatment costs and effects were assessed by comparing the 5-year, 10-year and lifetime risk of recurrence using Adjuvant! Online® (online algorithm), 70-gene signature or Oncotype DX® (21-gene assay). Results: 70-gene signature showed a life expectancy of 23.55 years at lifetime. Life expectancy was lower for 21-gene assay and online algorithm, with associated quality-adjusted life year gains up to 0.23 and 0.75, respectively, with 70-gene signature. At year 5, the mean cost of 21-gene assay, 70-gene signature and online algorithm was 7100, 6380 and 4580, respectively. 70-gene signature was dominant versus 21-gene assay at any time horizon and would be costeffective from year 7 versus online algorithm (lifetime: 1457 per quality-adjusted life years gained). Conclusions: 70-gene signature was a dominant strategy over 21-gene assay and was highly costeffective versus online algorithm.

10.1586/14737167.2014.957185http://hdl.handle.net/2445/59586