6533b859fe1ef96bd12b7959

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right DLPFC selectively modulates subprocesses in working memory

Jinhua TianJiarui WangLili TianRenning HaoQiang Liu

subject

Anodal tdcsMaintenancemedicine.medical_treatmentlcsh:MedicinePsychiatry and Psychologyta3112050105 experimental psychologyGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologytDCSUpdatingmemory03 medical and health sciencesRight DLPFC0302 clinical medicinemedicine0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesn-backta515n-backTranscranial direct-current stimulationWorking memoryGeneral Neuroscience05 social scienceslcsh:RWorking memorymuistiGeneral MedicinetyömuistiBrain stimulationDiscriminability IndexRight dorsolateral prefrontal cortexGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesPsychologyNeuroscience030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Background Working memory, as a complex system, consists of two independent components: manipulation and maintenance process, which are defined as executive control and storage process. Previous studies mainly focused on the overall effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory. However, little has been known about the segregative effects of tDCS on the sub-processes within working memory. Method Transcranial direct current stimulation, as one of the non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, is being widely used to modulate the cortical activation of local brain areas. This study modified a spatial n-back experiment with anodal and cathodal tDCS exertion on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), aiming to investigate the effects of tDCS on the two sub-processes of working memory: manipulation (updating) and maintenance. Meanwhile, considering the separability of tDCS effects, we further reconfirmed the causal relationship between the right DLPFC and the sub-processes of working memory with different tDCS conditions. Results The present study showed that cathodal tDCS on the right DLPFC selectively improved the performance of the modified 2-back task in the difficult condition, whereas anodal tDCS significantly reduced the performance of subjects and showed an speeding-up tendency of response time. More precisely, the results of discriminability index and criterion showed that only cathodal tDCS enhanced the performance of maintenance in the difficult condition. Neither of the two tDCS conditions affected the performance of manipulation (updating). Conclusion These findings provide evidence that cathodal tDCS of the right DLPFC selectively affects maintenance capacity. Besides, cathodal tDCS also serves as an interference suppressor to reduce the irrelevant interference, thereby indirectly improving the working memory capacity. Moreover, the right DLPFC is not the unique brain regions for working memory manipulation (updating).

10.7717/peerj.4906https://peerj.com/articles/4906/