6533b85afe1ef96bd12b8b3c

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of More-Affected vs. Less-Affected Motor Cortex tDCS in Parkinson’s Disease

Massimiliano TodiscoEnrico AlfonsiBrigida FierroGiuseppe CosentinoMarco D'amelioGiovanni SavettieriRosaria DavìFrancesca ValentinoFilippo Brighina

subject

0301 basic medicinemedicine.medical_specialtynon-invasive brain stimulationParkinson's diseaseNeurologymedicine.medical_treatmenttDCSlcsh:RC321-57103 medical and health sciencesBehavioral Neuroscience0302 clinical medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationmotor cortexmedicineParkinsonâ s diseaselcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryBiological PsychiatryOriginal ResearchTranscranial direct-current stimulationcortical excitabilitymedicine.diseaseTranscranial magnetic stimulationElectrophysiology030104 developmental biologymedicine.anatomical_structureNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyNeurologyPsychiatry and Mental HealthFinger tappingParkinson’s diseaseSettore MED/26 - NeurologiaPrimary motor cortexPsychologyNeuroscience030217 neurology & neurosurgeryMotor cortexCortical excitability; Motor cortex; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Parkinson’s disease; tDCS; Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; Neurology; Psychiatry and Mental Health; Biological Psychiatry; Behavioral NeuroscienceNeuroscience

description

Objective. To evaluate therapeutic potential of different montages of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients with asymmetric motor symptoms. Materials and Methods. Fourteen patients with asymmetric PD underwent, while on treatment, seven separate sessions including electrophysiological and clinical evaluation at baseline and after anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) of the two hemispheres. Changes in motor cortical excitability were evaluated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Effects on motor symptoms were assessed by testing finger tapping and upper limb bradykinesia, and by using the Italian validated Movement Disorder Society revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Results. Only anodal tDCS of the more-affected M1 (contralateral to the more-affected body side) and cathodal tDCS of the less-affected M1 (contralateral to the less-affected body side) were able to induce significant changes in cortical excitability, i.e. facilitation and inhibition of the motor evoked potentials respectively. The motor performances of both hands significantly improved after anodal tDCS of the more-affected M1, as well as after cathodal tDCS of the less-affected one. Conclusions. Our findings support the potential usefulness of tDCS as add-on treatment for asymmetric PD, also providing interesting clues on the possible pathophysiological role played by an asymmetric activation of homologous motor cortical areas in PD.

10.3389/fnhum.2017.00309http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00309