6533b85afe1ef96bd12b8b97

RESEARCH PRODUCT

“Practicing care in qualitative organizational research: moral responsibility and legitimacy in a study of immigration management”

Ida OkkonenEmma BellTuomo Takala

subject

Value (ethics)johtaminenOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Managementethics of caremedia_common.quotation_subjecttietoteoriaImmigrationorganisaatiotutkimus0603 philosophy ethics and religionFeminist theoryfeministinen teoriarelationalityOriginalityhoitoetiikkaengrossment0502 economics and businessvastaanottokeskuksetMoral responsibilitySociologyLegitimacymedia_commonbusiness.industry05 social sciencesepistemology06 humanities and the artsPublic relationseettisyysmaahanmuuttajatGeneral Business Management and AccountingInterdependenceEthics of carehoitohenkilöstö060301 applied ethicsetiikkakvalitatiivinen tutkimusbusiness050203 business & managementreceptivityimmigrationjohtajathoitotyö

description

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the reciprocal relations between the caregiving imparted by immigration centre managers and the role of the researcher in responding to the care that is given by managerial caregivers. To enable this, we draw on a feminist theory of care ethics that considers individuals as relationally interdependent.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis draws on a semi-structured interview study involving 20 Finnish immigration reception centre managers.FindingsInsight is generated by reflecting on moments of care that arise between research participants and the researcher in a study of immigration centre management. We emphasise the importance of mature care, receptivity and engrossment in building caring relationships with research participants by acknowledging the care they give to others. Our findings draw attention to the moral and epistemological responsibility to practice care in organizational research.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the relationality between practicing care in immigration centre management and doing qualitative organizational research, both of which rely on mature care, receptivity and engrossment in order to meet the other morally. We draw attention to the moral responsibility to care which characterises researcher–researched relationships and emphasise the importance of challenging methodological discourses that problematise or dismiss care in qualitative organizational research.

https://doi.org/10.1108/qrom-08-2020-2014