6533b85afe1ef96bd12b8d30
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The effect of dentine pre-treatment using bioglass and/or polyacrylic acid on the interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Agustín Pascual MoscardóSalvatore SauroVictor Pinheiro FeitosaArlinda Luzi LuziTimothy F. WatsonAvijit Banerjeesubject
Pre treatmentAdultCeramicsMaterials scienceSurface PropertiesGlass ionomer cementAcrylic Resins02 engineering and technologylaw.invention03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compoundTooth FracturesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicinestomatognathic systemlawBioglass 45S5Tensile StrengthLoad cyclingMaterials TestingHumansDental Restoration FailureComposite materialGeneral DentistryDental LeakageBond strengthPolyacrylic acidDental BondingResin modified030206 dentistry021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyMolarResin CementsAir Abrasion DentalchemistryGlass Ionomer CementsBioactive glassDentin-Bonding AgentsDentinGlass0210 nano-technologydescription
Objective To evaluate the effect of load-cycle aging and/or 6 months artificial saliva (AS) storage on bond durability and interfacial ultramorphology of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) applied to dentine air-abraded using Bioglass 45S5 (BAG) with/without polyacrylic acid (PAA) conditioning.Methods RMGIC (Ionolux, VOCO) was applied onto human dentine specimens prepared with silicon-carbide abrasive paper or air-abraded with BAG with or without the use of PAA conditioning. Half of bonded-teeth were submitted to load cycling (150,000 cycles) and half immersed in deionised water for 24 h. They were cut into matchsticks and submitted immediately to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing or 6 months in AS immersion and subsequently μTBS tested.Results were analysed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was performed using FE-SEM, while further RMGIC-bonded specimens were surveyed for interfacial ultramorphology characterisation (dye-assisted nanoleakage) using confocal microscopy. Results RMGIC applied onto dentine air-abraded with BAG regardless PAA showed no significant μTBS reduction after 6 months of AS storage and/or load cycling (p > 0.05). RMGIC–dentine interface showed no sign of degradation/nanoleakage after both aging regimens. Conversely, interfaces created in PAA-conditioned SiC-abraded specimens showed significant reduction in μTBS (p < 0.05) after 6 months of storage and/or load cycling with evident porosities within bonding interface.ConclusionsDentine pre-treatment using BAG air-abrasion might be a suitable strategy to enhance the bonding performance and durability of RMGIC applied to dentine. The use of PAA conditioner in smear layer-covered dentine may increase the risk of degradation at the bonding interface.Clinical significanceA combined dentine pre-treatment using bioglass followed by PAA may increase the bond strength and maintain it stable over time. Conversely, the use of PAA conditioning alone may offer no significant contribute to the immediate and prolonged bonding performance of modern RMGICs.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-02-28 | Journal of dentistry |