6533b85afe1ef96bd12ba009
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Osimertinib in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a cost–effectiveness analysis
Javier Aguilar-serraEzequiel Marti-bonmatiCristina Trigo-vicenteJulio CortijoJavier Milara PayáJavier MilaraAlfonso Pastor-cleriguesManuel Alós-almiñanaVicente Gimeno-ballestersubject
Oncologymedicine.medical_specialtyLung NeoplasmsCost effectivenessCost-Benefit AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compoundEgfr tki0302 clinical medicineCarcinoma Non-Small-Cell LungInternal medicinemedicineHumansOsimertinib030212 general & internal medicineLung cancerProtein Kinase Inhibitorshealth care economics and organizationsAcrylamidesAniline Compoundsbusiness.industryHealth PolicyCost-effectiveness analysismedicine.diseaseMarkov ChainsDacomitinibrespiratory tract diseasesErbB ReceptorsFirst line treatmentchemistry030220 oncology & carcinogenesisMutationQuality-Adjusted Life YearsNon small cellbusinessModels Econometricdescription
Aim: Osimertinib improves progression-free survival in first-line EGFR mutation–positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: A Markov cohort model including costs, utilities and disutilities, was conducted to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost–effectiveness ratio when treating with osimertinib versus standard first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Results: Osimertinib presented higher QALYs (0.61) compared with standard EGFR–TKIs (0.42). Osimertinib costs were €83,258.99, in comparison with €29,209.45 for the standard EGFR–TKIs. An incremental cost–effectiveness ratio of €273,895.36/QALY was obtained for osimertinib. Conclusion: Osimertinib was more effective in terms of QALYs gained than comparators (erlotinib–gefitinib). However, to obtain a cost–effectiveness alternative, a discount greater than 60% in osimertinib acquisition cost is required.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-09-04 | Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research |