6533b85bfe1ef96bd12bb369

RESEARCH PRODUCT

TOMBSTONE REMOVAL : Republication de : Recommandations Formalisées d’Experts. Prise en charge de la patiente avec une pré-éclampsie sévère - RFE Communes Société Française d’Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR) - Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CGNOF)

Marie BruyèreMarie-pierre BonnetA. RigouzzoLoïc SentilhesH. KeitaVincent CompèreLionel BouvetAgnès Le GouezElodie ClouqueurMax Gonzalez EstevezFlorence VialMathias RossignolJulien BureyFlorent FuchsPaul BerveillerPaul BerveillerTiphaine Raia-barjatCatherine FischerEmmanuel SimonThomas SchmitzAlexandre J VivantiLaurent ZieleskiewiczChloé ArthuisMarc GarnierMarie-victoire SenatValentina FaitotAdeline CastelEdouard LecarpentierEdouard Lecarpentier

subject

medicine.medical_specialty030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicinebusiness.industryModerate levelObstetrics and GynecologyEvidence-based medicineSevere preeclampsia3. Good healthQuality of evidence03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineReproductive MedicineFamily medicinemedicineGrading (education)business030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Abstract Objective To provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Design A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE(r)) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Methods The last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia were published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analysed according to the GRADE(r) methodology. Results The SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/−), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2+/−), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations. Conclusions There was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.10.001