6533b85bfe1ef96bd12bb6f3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Assessment of the ecotoxicity of phytotreatment substrate soil as landfill cover material for in-situ leachate management

Barbara ManachiniMaria Cristina LavagnoloFrancesco GarboCarlo Giovanni MorettoAlberto Pivato

subject

Crops AgriculturalEisenia fetidaEnvironmental Engineering0208 environmental biotechnologyEcotoxicological bioassay02 engineering and technology010501 environmental sciencesManagement Monitoring Policy and Law01 natural sciencesEnvironmental legislationSoilSoil PollutantsLeachateWaste Management and DisposalSubstrate soil chemical characterization0105 earth and related environmental sciencesPhytotreatmentbiologyLandfill leachate phytotreatmentEnvironmental engineeringGeneral MedicineContaminationbiology.organism_classificationSoil qualityRefuse Disposal020801 environmental engineeringEnergy cropWaste Disposal FacilitiesSettore AGR/11 - Entomologia Generale E ApplicataItalyBiofuelEnvironmental scienceEcotoxicityClosed landfillWater Pollutants Chemical

description

Phytotreatment capping in closed landfills is a promising, cost-effective, in situ option for sustainable leachate treatment and might be synergistically coupled with energy crops to produce renewable energy (e.g.: biodiesel or bioethanol). This study proposes to use 0.30 m of soil as growing substrate for plants cultivated on the temporary cover of closed landfills. Once the leachate phytotreatment process is no longer required, 0.70 m of the same soil would be added to attain the final top cover configuration. This solution would entail saving the costs of excavation and backfilling. However, worsening of the initial soil quality due to potential contaminant transfer from the liquid to the solid matrix must be avoided because EU legislation (such as that in Italy) fixes concentration limits for contaminants in soil. In this research, samples of soil used as substrate in a lab-scale leachate phytotreatment test with sunflowers were analysed to provide chemical characterization before, during, and at the end of the experiment. The results showed that the phytotreatment activity did not increase initial contaminant concentrations. These results are reinforced by those from ecotoxicological bioassays in which Eisenia fetida (earthworms), Lepidium sativum (cress), Folsomia candida (collembola), and Caenorhabditis elegans and Steinernema carpocapsae (nematodes) were used. It was observed that, by the end of the experiment, the substrate soil did not affect the earthworms, collembola and nematode behaviour, or the growth of cress.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.014http://hdl.handle.net/10447/358382