6533b85bfe1ef96bd12bbdfa
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Actinic Flux and Net Flux Calculations in Radiative Transfer—A Comparative Study of Computational Efficiency
Jochen LandgrafMerlinde KayMichael A. BoxThomas Trautmannsubject
PhysicsAtmospheric ScienceMatrix (mathematics)Flux (metallurgy)MeteorologyRadiative transferRange (statistics)Inverse transform samplingFocus (optics)ZenithAerosolComputational physicsdescription
Abstract The accuracy and speed of three well-known computational techniques (DISORT, the δ–four-stream approximation, and the two-stream approximation), and the matrix inversion method, which is less well known, have been investigated. Results are presented for both broadband actinic and net fluxes over a range of parameters including solar zenith cosine, relative humidity, and altitude for two different surface/aerosol systems: terrestrial and oceanic. The matrix inversion method can only calculate actinic fluxes; therefore, this is the main focus of this paper. Investigations into the comparative accuracy of the four techniques for the oceanic model with and without a cloud layer included are also presented. (DISORT is taken as the benchmark for this research.) Based on results presented here, it is found that for actinic flux calculations, the δ–four-stream approximation is slightly more accurate than the matrix inversion method, and that both are far more accurate than the two-stream approximation. H...
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2001-12-01 | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences |