6533b85dfe1ef96bd12bdd99

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The role of interventional radiology in the management of abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review of current evidences

Olivier PellerinVincent VidalMaxime BaratRaphael DautryPhilippe SoyerFrançois CornelisRomaric LoffroyAnthony DohanMaureen P. KohiMatthias Barral

subject

medicine.medical_specialty030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicineHysterectomymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industrymedicine.medical_treatmentArterial Embolization[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]Abdominal aortaInterventional radiologyReview Article3. Good health030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingSurgery03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineUterine artery embolizationmedicine.arteryOcclusionmedicineRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingEmbolizationbusinessAdverse effectComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS

description

Abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) is a potentially severe condition. To date, arterial embolization in women with postpartum hemorrhage due to AIP is the treatment option for which highest degrees of evidence are available. However, other techniques have been tested, including prophylactic catheter placement, balloon occlusion of the iliac arteries and abdominal aorta balloon occlusion. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of the currently reported interventional radiology procedures that are used for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage due to AIP and suggest recommendations based on current evidences. Owing to a high rate of adverse events, prophylactic occlusion of internal iliac arteries should be used with caution and applied when the endpoint is hysterectomy. On the opposite, when a conservative management is considered to preserve future fertility, uterine artery embolization should be the preferred option as it is associated with a hysterectomy rate of 15.5% compared to 76.5% with prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries and does not result in fetal irradiation. Limited data are available regarding the application of systematic prophylactic embolization and no comparative studies with arterial embolization are available.

10.21037/qims-20-548https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03124911