6533b85efe1ef96bd12bf39c

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Ankle muscle strength influence on muscle activation during dynamic and static ankle training modalities.

Sandro NiggBenno M. NiggHendrik EndersJennifer BaltichAngel Gabriel Lucas-cuevas

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyMovementBalance trainingPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationBarefootRunning03 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineAnkle injuryIsometric ContractionMedicineHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicineAnkle InjuriesMuscle StrengthMuscle SkeletalExercisePostural BalanceModalitiesbusiness.industryFootMuscle weaknessMuscle activation030229 sport sciencesShoesmedicine.anatomical_structureTorqueMuscle strengthPhysical therapyFemaleAnklemedicine.symptomAnklebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryAnkle Joint

description

Muscle weakness is considered a risk factor for ankle injury. Balance training and barefoot running have been used in an attempt to strengthen the muscles crossing the ankle. It is expected that training tasks that successfully strengthen the ankle would elicit increased muscular activity. However, it is unknown how an individual's ankle strength will influence the muscle activity used during a given task. Twenty-six participants performed dynamic (shod, barefoot running) and static tasks (squat on ground, squat on ®Bosu Ball) believed to strengthen the muscles surrounding the ankle. Electromyographic signals of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) were recorded and analysed using a non-linearly scaled wavelet analysis. Participants were divided into a strong group and a weak group according to their isometric plantar-flexion torque. The weak group required more relative GL and GM muscle activity during each training task compared to the strong group. No difference was observed between shod and barefoot running. There was a significant effect of training task on muscle activation level for the weak group. Differences in ankle strength had a significant impact on muscle activation.

10.1080/02640414.2015.1072640https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26228260