6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c10d6
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Small field motion detection in goldfish is red-green color blind and mediated by the M-cone type
Martin GehresChrista Neumeyersubject
PhysicsCommunicationBehavior AnimalAdaptation OcularPhysiologybusiness.industryColor visionMotion PerceptionMotion detectionObject motionStimulus (physiology)Choice BehaviorSensory SystemsSmall fieldOpticsGreen colorGoldfishRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsOptomotor responseAnimalsbusinessColor PerceptionPhotic StimulationExcitationdescription
Large field motion detection in goldfish, measured in the optomotor response, is based on the L-cone type, and is therefore color-blind (Schaerer & Neumeyer, 1996). In experiments using a two-choice training procedure, we investigated now whether the same holds for the detection of a small moving object (size: 8 mm diameter; velocity: 7 cm/s). In initial experiments, we found that goldfish did not discriminate between a moving and a stationary stimulus, obviously not taking attention to the cue “moving.” Therefore, random dot patterns were used in which the stimulus was visible only when moving. Using black and white random dot patterns with variable contrast between 0.2 and 1, we found that the fish could see motion only with high (0.8) contrast. In the decisive experiment, a red-green random dot pattern was used. By keeping the intensity of the red dots constant and reducing the intensity of the green dots, a narrow intensity range was found in which goldfish could no longer discriminate between the moving random dot stimulus in random dot surround and the stationary random dot pattern. The same was the case when a red moving disk was presented in green surround. This is the evidence that object motion is red-green color blind, i.e., color information cannot be used to detect the moving object. Calculations of the cone excitation values revealed that the M-cone type is decisive, as this cone type (and not the L-cone type) is not modulated by that particular red-green pattern in which the moving stimulus was invisible.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007-04-02 | Visual Neuroscience |