6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c10e7

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Addition of an Immunosuppressant After Loss of Response to Anti-TNFα Monotherapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A 2-Year Study

R. OrlandoMario CottoneMarco AffrontiFabio Salvatore MacalusoSara RennaAmbrogio OrlandoMarco VentimigliaGiulia RizzutoEmanuele OrlandoMarta Di PisaC. Sapienza

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyDatabases FactualCombination therapyGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDrug Administration Schedule03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicinemedicineAdalimumabHumansImmunology and AllergyProspective StudiesAdverse effectbiologyTumor Necrosis Factor-alphabusiness.industryRemission InductionC-reactive proteinAdalimumabGastroenterologyAntibodies MonoclonalMiddle AgedInflammatory Bowel Diseasesmedicine.diseaseInfliximabGolimumabInfliximabDiscontinuationC-Reactive ProteinTreatment Outcome030220 oncology & carcinogenesisbiology.proteinDrug Therapy CombinationFemale030211 gastroenterology & hepatologybusinessImmunosuppressive Agentsmedicine.drug

description

Background The addition of an immunosuppressant (IM) after loss of response to anti-TNFα monotherapy is an emerging strategy of therapeutic optimization in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, few clinical data have been reported to date. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this selective combination therapy in patients with IBD. Methods All consecutive patients with loss of response to anti-TNFα monotherapy despite an intensive dose optimization who added an IM from October 2014 to October 2016 were entered into a prospective database. Results Among 630 patients treated with anti-TNFα agents during the study period, 46 (7.3%) added an IM. A total of 31 patients (67.4%) were treated with an intravenous anti-TNFα (infliximab, as originator or biosimilar), while 15 (32.6%) were treated with a subcutaneous anti-TNFα agent (10 adalimumab and 5 golimumab). The mean duration of follow-up was 12.8 ± 7.3 months. Twenty-one patients (45.7%) remained on combination therapy at the end of follow-up: 15 (32.6%) maintained a steroid-free remission, and 6 (13.0%) achieved a clinical response. In patients who experienced treatment success, the median value of C-reactive protein decreased from baseline to the end of follow-up (13.2 vs 3.0, P = 0.01; normal values <5 mg/L). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 8 out of 46 patients (17.4%). Conclusions In the largest cohort on this argument reported to date, the addition of an IM was an effective and safe optimization strategy after loss of response to anti-TNFα monotherapy. Low doses of IM were sufficient to achieve a clinical response.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izx010