6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c1db3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Present-day uplift of the European Alps: Evaluating mechanisms and models of their relative contributions

Pierre G. VallaPierre G. VallaLaurent JolivetCarole PetitSean D. WillettSébastien CastelltortPietro SternaiAndrea WalpersdorfJean-mathieu NocquetThorsten W. BeckerLaurent HussonGiorgio SpadaChristian SueAndrea Di GiulioEnrico SerpelloniClaudio Faccenna

subject

European Alps Vertical displacement rate Deglaciation Erosion Lithospheric structural changes Mantle flowVertical displacement rate010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesEuropean AlpPresent day010502 geochemistry & geophysics01 natural sciencesPaleontologyLithospheric structural changesMantle convectionLithosphereDeglaciationddc:550ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS0105 earth and related environmental sciences[SDU.STU.TE]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/TectonicsDeglaciationMantle flow15. Life on landLithospheric structural changeTectonics13. Climate actionErosionSlabGeneral Earth and Planetary SciencesUpwellingEuropean AlpsEarth and Planetary Sciences (all)Surface massGeology

description

Abstract Recent measurements of surface vertical displacements of the European Alps show a correlation between vertical velocities and topographic features, with widespread uplift at rates of up to ~2–2.5 mm/a in the North-Western and Central Alps, and ~1 mm/a across a continuous region from the Eastern to the South-Western Alps. Such a rock uplift rate pattern is at odds with the horizontal velocity field, characterized by shortening and crustal thickening in the Eastern Alps and very limited deformation in the Central and Western Alps. Proposed mechanisms of rock uplift rate include isostatic response to the last deglaciation, long-term erosion, detachment of the Western Alpine slab, as well as lithospheric and surface deflection due to mantle convection. Here, we assess previous work and present new estimates of the contributions from these mechanisms. Given the large range of model estimates, the isostatic adjustment to deglaciation and erosion are sufficient to explain the full observed rate of uplift in the Eastern Alps, which, if correct, would preclude a contribution from horizontal shortening and crustal thickening. Alternatively, uplift is a partitioned response to a range of mechanisms. In the Central and Western Alps, the lithospheric adjustment to deglaciation and erosion likely accounts for roughly half of the rock uplift rate, which points to a noticeable contribution by mantle-related processes such as detachment of the European slab and/or asthenospheric upwelling. While it is difficult to independently constrain the patterns and magnitude of mantle contributions to ongoing Alpine vertical displacements at present, future data should provide additional insights. Regardless, interacting tectonic and surface mass redistribution processes, rather than an individual forcing, best explain ongoing Alpine elevation changes.

10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.005http://hdl.handle.net/11585/771663