6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c1e32

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Extraction of Airways from CT (EXACT'09)

Rafael WiemkerAnthony P. ReevesCatalin FetitaJan SijbersTarunashree YavarnaJaesung LeeMargarete OrtnerEva M. Van RikxoortOliver WeinheimerEric A. HoffmanPim A. De JongBenjamin L. OdryBenjamin IrvingMarco FeuersteinKen MoriChristian BauerJoseph M. ReinhardtReinhard BeichelBram Van GinnekenJesper Holst PedersenAnna FabijańskaCarlos S. MendozaSilvia BornIeneke J. C. HartmannPechin LoMarleen De BruijneRomulo PinhoJuerg TschirrenDavid P. NaidichMathias Prokop

subject

Scanner[ INFO.INFO-TS ] Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image ProcessingDatabases Factual[SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/ImagingComputed tomographyAetiology screening and detection [ONCOL 5]02 engineering and technology[ SPI.SIGNAL ] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingSet (abstract data type)03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine[INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringMedicineHumansComputer visionSegmentationElectrical and Electronic EngineeringLung[ SDV.IB.IMA ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/ImagingComputer. AutomationAnalysis of VarianceRadiological and Ultrasound Technologymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryPhysicsRangingImage segmentationComputer Science ApplicationsRadiographic Image EnhancementTrachea020201 artificial intelligence & image processingArtificial intelligenceTomographyAirwaybusinessTomography X-Ray ComputedEngineering sciences. TechnologyPoverty-related infectious diseases Aetiology screening and detection [N4i 3]Cardiovascular diseases Aetiology screening and detection [NCEBP 14][SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processingSoftwareAlgorithms

description

Contains fulltext : 107854.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) This paper describes a framework for establishing a reference airway tree segmentation, which was used to quantitatively evaluate fifteen different airway tree extraction algorithms in a standardized manner. Because of the sheer difficulty involved in manually constructing a complete reference standard from scratch, we propose to construct the reference using results from all algorithms that are to be evaluated. We start by subdividing each segmented airway tree into its individual branch segments. Each branch segment is then visually scored by trained observers to determine whether or not it is a correctly segmented part of the airway tree. Finally, the reference airway trees are constructed by taking the union of all correctly extracted branch segments. Fifteen airway tree extraction algorithms from different research groups are evaluated on a diverse set of twenty chest computed tomography ({CT}) scans of subjects ranging from healthy volunteers to patients with severe pathologies, scanned at different sites, with different {CT} scanner brands, models, and scanning protocols. Three performance measures covering different aspects of segmentation quality were computed for all participating algorithms. Results from the evaluation showed that no single algorithm could extract more than an average of 74\% of the total length of all branches in the reference standard, indicating substantial differences between the algorithms. A fusion scheme that obtained superior results is presented, demonstrating that there is complementary information provided by the different algorithms and there is still room for further improvements in airway segmentation algorithms.

http://hdl.handle.net/2066/107854