6533b860fe1ef96bd12c3134
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Reply to Ben-Dor and Barkai: A low Zn isotope ratio is not equal to a low Zn content
Klervia JaouenThomas TütkenNicolas BourgonTina LüdeckeGeoff M. SmithDomingo C. Salazar-garcíaJean-jacques HublinVanessa Villalba-moucoPauline Méjeansubject
Multidisciplinary[SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory[SHS.ANTHRO-BIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Biological anthropology[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and NutritionPrehistòriadescription
However, we are afraid that there was a misunderstanding in the interpretation of our data. Ben-Dor and Barkai (2) wrote that "One explanation presented in the [our] paper was that Neandertals may have consumed body parts and animals that were relatively poor in zinc, like the liver or deer." This sentence is not reflecting our conclusions: We discussed Zn isotope ratios (i.e., 66Zn/64Zn ratio expressed as a δ66Zn value) and not Zn concentrations. To explain low δ66Zn values of the Neandertal tooth, we propose that Neandertals ate food items depleted in heavy Zn isotopes (and therefore enriched in light Zn isotopes), but those foods can have variable Zn contents, independent of the Zn isotope composition as such.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2023-01-31 | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |