6533b861fe1ef96bd12c451b

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Methodological issues in a cross-sectional survey on cervical cancer screening using telephone interviews in Sicily (Italy): a SWOT analysis

Alessandra CasuccioGiusy Russo FiorinoAngela GiustiMarialuisa ManigliaSofia ColaceciValentina MarcheseGiorgio GrazianoDaniele Domenico RaiaSandro ProvenzanoStefania Enza BonoClaudio CostantinoOmar Enzo SantangeloGiuseppe NapoliMazzucco WalterSara PalmeriVincenzo RestivoLaura SaporitoGianmarco VenturaClaudia Marotta

subject

Medicine (General)medicine.medical_specialtyCross-sectional studycervical cancer screeningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsSWOT analysiCervical cancer screeningBiochemistryInterviews as Topic03 medical and health sciencesR5-9200302 clinical medicineSurveys and QuestionnairesmedicineHumansMass Screening030212 general & internal medicinetelephone surveySWOT analysisSicilyCross-sectional studybusiness.industryBiochemistry (medical)interviewer trainingSWOT analysisCell BiologyGeneral MedicinePre-Clinical Research ReportsTelephoneTelephone surveyCross-Sectional Studies030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFamily medicinegeneral practitionerFemalebusiness

description

Objective A cross-sectional study on knowledge, perceptions, and adherence to cervical cancer screening was conducted using telephone interviews of Sicilian women that were performed in 2016. This study aimed to identify areas that need to be addressed to improve the validity of data collection and to minimize possible biases. Methods We performed a qualitative study through SWOT analysis, which is a multidimensional method based on evaluation of Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T) of the research project. The contents of the SWOT forms underwent categorical, inductive, and deductive data analysis using the long table analysis method. Results The full availability of an updated address and phone number list was the main organizational aspect to be addressed. Socio-cultural context played a major role for understanding the questions and for acceptability of the topics. In some cases, a family member was a facilitating element, while in others, the family member hindered the interviews. Active involvement of general practitioners was considered essential for success of the interviews. Conclusions When performing a cross-sectional survey, organizational aspects and active involvement of general practitioners are crucial in the enrolment phase, regardless of the socio-cultural context.

10.1177/0300060519860950http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6833421