6533b861fe1ef96bd12c4eb5

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Reduced Rivaroxaban Dose Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: ADRIFT a Randomized Pilot Study.

Nicolas LelloucheMarie Hauguel-moreauDidier KlugHui WangJean-michel JuliardGuillaume DuthoitIsabelle Martin-toutainEric VicautN. ZannadDelphine BrugierCorinne FrereJacques MansouratiSandrine DeltourGregory DucrocqSolohaja-faniaha DimbyEric BrochetEloi MarijonNassim BraikLuc LorgisNadjib HammoudiJohanne SilvainChristian SpauldingBatric PopovicAntoine LepillierDavid AttiasGilles MontalescotAlexandre Ceccaldi

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyCardiac CatheterizationPercutaneousTime FactorsAntithrombin IIIAtrial AppendagePilot Projects030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineFibrinolytic AgentsRivaroxabanLeft atrialHeart RateInternal medicineAtrial FibrillationMedicineHumansAtrial Appendage030212 general & internal medicineContraindicationBlood CoagulationAgedAppendageAged 80 and overRivaroxabanbusiness.industryDual Anti-Platelet TherapyAtrial fibrillationThrombosisClopidogrelmedicine.diseasePeptide Fragments3. Good healthTreatment OutcomeCardiologyAtrial Function LeftFemaleProthrombinFranceCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessBiomarkersPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsmedicine.drugFactor Xa InhibitorsPeptide Hydrolases

description

Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) exposes to the risk of device thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation who frequently have a contraindication to full anticoagulation. Thereby, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is usually preferred. No randomized study has evaluated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant after LAAC, and we decided to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced doses of rivaroxaban after LAAC. Methods: ADRIFT (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure) is a multicenter, phase IIb study, which randomized 105 patients after successful LAAC to either rivaroxaban 10 mg (R 10 , n=37), rivaroxaban 15 mg (R 15 , n=35), or DAPT with aspirin 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg (n=33). The primary end point was thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1+2) measured 2 to 4 hours after drug intake, 10 days after treatment initiation. Thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimers, rivaroxaban concentrations were also measured at 10 days and 3 months. Clinical end points were evaluated at 3-month follow-up. Results: The primary end point was reduced with R 10 (179 pmol/L [interquartile range (IQR), 129–273], P <0.0001) and R 15 (163 pmol/L [IQR, 112–231], P <0.0001) as compared with DAPT (322 pmol/L [IQR, 218–528]). We observed no significant reduction of the primary end point between R 10 and R 15 while rivaroxaban concentrations increased significantly from 184 ng/mL (IQR, 127–290) with R 10 to 274 ng/mL (IQR, 192–377) with R 15 , P <0.0001. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and D-dimers were numerically lower with both rivaroxaban doses than with DAPT. These findings were all confirmed at 3 months. The clinical end points were not different between groups. A device thrombosis was noted in 2 patients assigned to DAPT. Conclusions: Thrombin generation measured after LAAC was lower in patients treated by reduced rivaroxaban doses than DAPT, supporting an alternative to the antithrombotic regimens currently used after LAAC and deserves further evaluation in larger studies. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03273322.

10.1161/circinterventions.119.008481https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32674680