6533b861fe1ef96bd12c502e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Palliative sedation in patients with advanced cancer followed at home: A systematic review

Sebastiano MercadanteVeruska CostanzoFlavio FuscoAlessandro ValleFederica AielliGiampiero Porzio

subject

end of lifemedicine.medical_specialtyPalliative careSedationMEDLINEPainContext (language use)Palliative sedationend of life; home care; Palliative sedation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Delirium; Dyspnea; Home Care Services; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Palliative Care; Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Neurology (clinical); Nursing (all)2901 Nursing (miscellaneous)NeoplasmsmedicineHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive care medicineProspective cohort studyGeneral NursingNursing (all)2901 Nursing (miscellaneous)Retrospective StudiesClinical Trials as Topicbusiness.industryPalliative CareDeliriumRetrospective cohort studyHome Care ServicesDyspneaTreatment OutcomeAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineMeta-analysisMidazolamNeurology (clinical)medicine.symptombusinesshome caremedicine.drug

description

Abstract Context Patients with advanced cancer who are near the end of life may experience intolerable suffering refractory to targeted palliative therapies. Palliative sedation (PS) is considered to be an effective treatment modality for these refractory symptoms when aggressive efforts fail to provide relief. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically review articles regarding PS performed at home in patients with intractable symptoms. Methods Literature databases searched included MedLine, PubMed, and EMBASE. The text words and MeSH/EMTREE terms "home care" and "sedation" were used for electronic database searches. Results Six articles met the inclusion criteria for research and reported data regarding patients who were sedated at home. Although an early study reported a rate of more than 50%, the majority of the most recent literature, even though retrospective, shows an incidence of PS of 5%–36%. Agitated delirium, dyspnea, and pain were the most common problems requiring PS. The duration was variable (the mean across studies 1–3.5 days), and has not been statistically associated with hastened death. Benzodiazepines, specifically midazolam, have been most frequently used, alone or in combination with neuroleptics and opioids; in one article, opioids were given alone. Conclusion PS at home seems to be a feasible treatment option among selected patients and makes a potentially important contribution to improving care for those who choose to die at home. Although the existing studies provide only low-quality evidence, the decision to use PS does not seem to anticipate patients' death. More homogeneous prospective studies on a large number of patients should confirm this observation.

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.013http://hdl.handle.net/11697/105968