6533b861fe1ef96bd12c5977

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Downscaling rice yield simulation at sub-field scale using remotely sensed LAI data

Manuel Campos-tabernerCarlo GilardelliRoberto ConfalonieriLuigi RanghettiFranciso Javier Garcia-haroTommaso StellaMirco Boschetti

subject

0106 biological sciencesSoil SciencePlant Science01 natural sciencesYield (wine)WARM modelCrop modelLeaf area indexCropping systemDecision support systemRemote sensing2. Zero hungerCrop yieldYield predictions04 agricultural and veterinary sciencesRemote sensing15. Life on landAgronomyData assimilation040103 agronomy & agriculture0401 agriculture forestry and fisheriesEnvironmental sciencePrecision agricultureScale (map)Agronomy and Crop ScienceCropping010606 plant biology & botanyDownscaling

description

Abstract Crop modeling and remote sensing are key tools to gain deeper understanding on cropping system dynamics and, ultimately, to increase the sustainability of agricultural productions. This study presents a system to estimate rice yields at sub-field scale based on the integration of a biophysical model and remotely sensed products. Leaf area index (LAI) data derived from decametric optical imageries (i.e., Landsat-8, Landsat-7 and Sentinel–2A) were assimilated into the WARM rice model via automatic recalibration of crop parameters at a fine spatial resolution (30 m × 30 m), targeting the lowest error between simulated and remotely sensed LAI. The performance of the system was evaluated by comparing simulated yield using default and recalibrated parameters at sub-field scale with yield maps generated by a GPS-equipped harvester. The training dataset included 40 paddy fields in Northern Italy, which were sampled during three cropping seasons, from 2014 to 2016. The assimilation of remotely sensed LAI into model parameters increased the accuracy of the system: MAE and RRMSE were 0.66 t ha-1 [CI: 0.54 t ha-1–0.78 t ha-1] and 13.8% [CI: 11.7%–15.7%], respectively, whereas they were 0.82 t ha-1 [CI: 0.68 t ha-1–0.96 t ha-1) and 15.7% [CI: 14.1%,–17.4%] without assimilation. Moreover, the system allowed to properly reproduce the within-field yield variability, thus laying the basis for possible applications in precision agriculture advisory services.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.12.003