6533b861fe1ef96bd12c5a1d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Social environmental impact of Covid-19 and erectile dysfunction: an explorative review
Mark A. TullyIgor GrabovacDamiano PizzolSimona IppolitiPinar SoysalJose M. MuyorRamy Abou GhaydaLee SmithAi KoyanagiDaragh T. McdermottMike TrottPetre-cristian IlieLaurie T. ButlerAnne CarrieNicola VeroneseJose M. Oliva LozanoLovro MarkovicYvonne BarnettJae Il Shinsubject
AdultMaleCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)AdolescentSexual healthEndocrinology Diabetes and MetabolismHealth PersonnelPopulationSocial EnvironmentErectile dysfunction · Sexual health · COVID-19 · PrevalenceYoung AdultEndocrinologyQuality of life (healthcare)Erectile DysfunctionEnvironmental healthHealth carePandemicPrevalenceMedicineHumansEnvironmental impact assessmentErectile dysfunctioneducationReproductive healtheducation.field_of_studybusiness.industrySARS-CoV-2COVID-19Middle Agedmedicine.diseaseErectile dysfunctionbusinessdescription
Background-\ud \ud To date, no attempt has been made to collate literature on the relationship between the social environmental impact of COVID-19 and erectile dysfunction. The aim of this explorative review was to assess and compare the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in male healthcare workers and males during the COVID-19 pandemic.\ud \ud Methods-\ud \ud A systematic review of major databases from inception to February 2021 was conducted. Prevalence data were extracted, and a random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken.\ud \ud Outcomes-\ud \ud The pooled prevalence of ED amongst healthcare workers working in COVID-19 specific environments, and non-healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic.\ud \ud Results-\ud \ud Of 52 initial studies, six were included for the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of ED in healthcare workers working in a COVID-19 environment was 63.6% (95% CI 20.3–92.3%), and in non-healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic was 31.9% (95% CI 19.5–47.6%).\ud \ud Conclusion-\ud \ud The prevalence of ED in healthcare workers working in COVID-19 environments was higher than representative samples and is of concern. Sexual health (and by extension, overall health), should be a priority when considering ways to care for this population. Considering the social environmental impact of COVID-19 on sexual health and in particular on ED, it is important to provide adequate psychological support systems and to promote quality of life with particular attention to sexual health.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-09-24 |