6533b861fe1ef96bd12c5a8a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Avoidance of Overtreatment of Rectal Cancer by Selective Chemoradiotherapy: Results of the Optimized Surgery and MRI-Based Multimodal Therapy Trial.

Rena ThomasmeyerJoerg BaralReinhard RuppertJoachim StrassburgMartin E. KreisAndreas LewinRainer KubeCornelius BambauerJoerg SauerGuenther WindeSigmar StelznerSoenke ScheunemannTheodor JungingerPaul HermanekSusanne MerkelAxel FaedrichChristoph A. Maurer

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyColorectal cancermedicine.medical_treatmentMedical OveruseDisease-Free Survival03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineHumansProspective StudiesStage (cooking)Adverse effectPathologicalAgedNeoplasm StagingAged 80 and overProctectomybusiness.industryRectal NeoplasmsCarcinomaRectumMultimodal therapyChemoradiotherapy AdjuvantMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseTotal mesorectal excisionMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapySurgeryRadiation therapy030220 oncology & carcinogenesisCase-Control StudiesPractice Guidelines as Topic030211 gastroenterology & hepatologySurgeryFemaleNeoplasm Recurrence LocalbusinessChemoradiotherapyFollow-Up Studies

description

Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with rectal cancer carries a high risk of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to examine the selective application of nCRT based on patient risk profile, as determined by MRI, to find the optimal range between undertreatment and overtreatment. Study Design In this prospective multicenter observational study, nCRT before total mesorectal excision (TME) was indicated in high-risk patients with involved or threatened mesorectal fascia (≤1 mm), or cT4 or cT3 carcinomas of the lower rectal third. All other patients received primary surgery. Results Of the 1,093 patients, 878 (80.3%) were treated according to the protocol, 526 patients (59.9%) underwent primary surgery, and 352 patients (40.1%) underwent nCRT followed by surgery. The 3-year locoregional recurrence (LR) rate was 3.1%. Of 604 patients with clinical stages II and III, 267 (44.2%) had primary surgery; 337 (55.8%) received nCRT followed by TME. The 3-year LR rate was 3.9%, without significant differences between groups. In patients with clinical stages II and III who underwent primary surgery, 27.3% were diagnosed with pathological stage I. Conclusions The results justify the restriction of nCRT to high-risk patients with rectal cancer classified by pretreatment MRI. Provided that a high-quality MRI diagnosis, TME surgery, and standardized examination of the resected specimen are performed, nCRT, with its adverse effects, costs, and treatment time can be avoided in more than 40% of patients with stage II or III rectal cancer with minimal risk of undertreatment. ( clinicaltrials.gov NCT325649)

10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.06.023https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34273318