6533b862fe1ef96bd12c63ea

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Resistance Training Induces Antiatherogenic Effects on Metabolomic Pathways

Heikki PeltonenJohanna K. IhalainenJohanna K. IhalainenMaria Kuusmaa-schildtJuha P. AhtiainenJuha J. HulmiJuha J. HulmiMarkus PerolaMarkus PerolaSimon WalkerHeikki V. SarinHeikki V. Sarin

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyWeight LiftingApolipoprotein BLipoproteinsPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyBody Mass Index03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineRisk FactorsInternal medicinemedicineMetabolomeHumansMetabolomicsOrthopedics and Sports MedicineLongitudinal StudiesMuscle StrengthAmino Acids2. Zero hungerbiologymedicine.diagnostic_testCholesterolbusiness.industryFatty AcidsResistance TrainingCholesterol LDL030229 sport sciencesAtherosclerosisLipidsDiet3. Good healthCholesterolEndocrinologychemistryBody CompositionLean body massbiology.proteinBiomarker (medicine)businessLipid profileBody mass indexBiomarkersLipoprotein

description

INTRODUCTION Arising evidence suggests that resistance training has the potential to induce beneficial modulation of biomarker profile. To date, however, only immediate responses to resistance training have been investigated using high-throughput metabolomics whereas the effects of chronic resistance training on biomarker profile have not been studied in detail. METHODS A total of 86 recreationally active healthy men without previous systematic resistance training background were allocated into (i) a resistance training (RT) group (n = 68; age, 33 ± 7 yr; body mass index, 28 ± 3 kg·m) and (ii) a non-RT group (n = 18; age, 31 ± 4 yr; body mass index, 27 ± 3 kg·m). Blood samples were collected at baseline (PRE), after 4 wk (POST-4wk), and after 16 wk of resistance training intervention (POST-16wk), as well as baseline and after the non-RT period (20-24 wk). Nuclear magnetic resonance-metabolome platform was used to determine metabolomic responses to chronic resistance training. RESULTS Overall, the resistance training intervention resulted in favorable alterations (P < 0.05) in body composition with increased levels of lean mass (~2.8%), decreased levels of android (~9.6%), and total fat mass (~7.5%). These changes in body composition were accompanied by antiatherogenic alterations in serum metabolome profile (false discovery rate < 0.05) as reductions in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (e.g., free cholesterol, remnant cholesterol, intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterols, low-density lipoprotein cholesterols) and related apolipoprotein B, and increments in conjugated linoleic fatty acids levels were observed. Individuals with the poorest baseline status (i.e., body composition, metabolome profile) benefitted the most from the resistance training intervention. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, resistance training improves cardiometabolic risk factors and serum metabolome even in previously healthy young men. Thus, suggesting attenuated risk for future cardiovascular disease.

https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002003