6533b862fe1ef96bd12c6b51
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Investigating Measures of Achievement Motivation(s)
Boris EgloffStefan SchmukleMarkus BühnerMatthias Zieglersubject
Predictive validityNeed for achievementReplicateConstruct (philosophy)Empirical evidencePsychologySocial psychologyBiological PsychiatryGeneral PsychologyTest (assessment)description
After a long debate there is now growing agreement that implicit and explicit achievement motivation can be seen as distinct constructs. One of their major differences lies in their predictive validity, which supposedly differs depending on the setting. Empirical evidence exists to the effect that different explicit measures based on different theoretical concepts build one construct. For implicit measures, however, such evidence is lacking. Thus, scores on three implicit and three explicit achievement motivation measures, an intelligence test, and a Big 5 questionnaire were obtained (N = 150) as well as two criteria. The explicit achievement motivation measures were classified as being based either on Murray’s or on McClelland’s theory. Results replicate the idea of a common construct for explicit measures but not for implicit measures. The assumed predictions did not occur for all tests and disappeared when controlling for intelligence.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010-01-01 | Journal of Individual Differences |