6533b862fe1ef96bd12c6e11
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comment on "High-pressure phases of group-II difluorides: Polymorphism and superionicity"
Claudio CazorlaDaniel Errandoneasubject
PhysicsCondensed Matter - Materials ScienceGroup iiDifluorideAb initioThermodynamicsMaterials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)FOS: Physical sciences02 engineering and technology021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology01 natural sciencesPolymorphism (materials science)Ab initio quantum chemistry methodsHigh pressurePhase (matter)0103 physical sciences010306 general physics0210 nano-technologyPhase diagramdescription
Nelson et al. [Phys. Rev. B 95, 054118 (2017)] recently have reported first-principles calculations on the behaviour of group-II difluorides (BeF$_{2}$, MgF$_{2}$, and CaF$_{2}$) under high-pressure and low- and high-temperature conditions. The calculations were based on ab initio random structure searching and the quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA). Here, we point out that, despite the of inestimable value of such calculations at high-pressure and low-temperature conditions, the high-$P$ high-$T$ phase diagram proposed by Nelson et al. for CaF$_{2}$ neither is in qualitative agreement with the results of previous ab initio molecular dynamics simulations nor with the existing corps of experimental data. Therefore, we conclude that the QHA-based approach employed by Nelson et al. cannot be applied reliably to the study of phase boundaries involving superionic phases. This conclusion is further corroborated by additional ab initio calculations performed in the superionic compounds SrF$_{2}$, BaF$_{2}$, Li$_{3}$OCl, and AgI.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-11-13 |